Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gregory Fugate's avatar

Nuance matters here.

You’re pointing at a real failure mode — consensus replacing reality-testing, empathy being used as a substitute for enforcement, and institutions collapsing because they refuse to tolerate friction. But reducing that pathology to “female voting” or biology is a category error.

Consensus-seeking today isn’t female. It’s institutionalized conflict-avoidance — and it has been deliberately taught, rewarded, and enforced across education, HR culture, and institutional governance for two generations.

Men didn’t resist it; they adapted to it, staffed it, administered it, and enforced it. Some of the most enthusiastic consensus enforcers are male judges, male bureaucrats, male academics, and male media figures.

This isn’t estrogen. It’s conditioning.

What we’re actually seeing is moral outsourcing. People no longer want to exercise judgment — they want coverage. Consensus provides that. If everyone agrees, no one is responsible. If the process approved it, no one chose it. If the narrative dominates, dissent becomes immoral by default.

That failure isn’t rooted in women’s psychology. It’s rooted in institutions that refuse to enforce boundaries while pretending empathy is a substitute for consequences.

And here’s the real tragedy: consensus culture doesn’t protect women — it exposes them. Not because women are too empathetic, but because systems that refuse to say “no” inevitably abandon the vulnerable when reality asserts itself.

Empathy without enforcement isn’t compassion. It’s dereliction.

Linda Willis's avatar

I am a female and an empath, but I am not like what you describe in your commentary. I in no way follow the crowd or the consensus, rather I do my own research and form my own conclusions. I am designed to consider the needs of the tribe, but I am not someone who would cowtow to group think and I have no issue at all going against the grain or confronting those I disagree with. I don’t belong to groups other than participate in some social media where I gather information and then sift through it for the truth. I am built for emotion and sensitivity, but I am also strongly logical and analytical in my thinking. I believe the women you are thinking go for consensus over rule of law are the idealists and the extroverts for who life revolves around belonging to a group. But not all of us are like that.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?